<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Adrian Peterson&#8217;s amazing, except when the Vikings win	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/adrian-petersons-amazing-except-when-the-vikings-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/adrian-petersons-amazing-except-when-the-vikings-win/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Corey		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/adrian-petersons-amazing-except-when-the-vikings-win/#comment-6113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=5641#comment-6113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s an extremely simple explanation for this: Peterson&#039;s long runs skew the numbers to the point of making any analysis of them next to useless.

Peterson averaged 17.3 carries in the Vikings&#039; six losses. Three of his runs in those games went for 82, 74 and 64 yards. Take out those three carries and you have a line of 101 carries for 540 yards, or 5.35 YPC. In Minnesota&#039;s 10 wins, Peterson had long runs of 82, 61 and 51. Subtract out those three carries, and you get a line of 241 carries for 1,141 yards, or 4.73 YPC.

By just pulling out three runs, your gap goes from 1.92 to 0.62. (Hardly scientific, but I think it illustrates pretty well that one or two long runs — which he could break at any time against any team — have a huge impact on the numbers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an extremely simple explanation for this: Peterson&#8217;s long runs skew the numbers to the point of making any analysis of them next to useless.</p>
<p>Peterson averaged 17.3 carries in the Vikings&#8217; six losses. Three of his runs in those games went for 82, 74 and 64 yards. Take out those three carries and you have a line of 101 carries for 540 yards, or 5.35 YPC. In Minnesota&#8217;s 10 wins, Peterson had long runs of 82, 61 and 51. Subtract out those three carries, and you get a line of 241 carries for 1,141 yards, or 4.73 YPC.</p>
<p>By just pulling out three runs, your gap goes from 1.92 to 0.62. (Hardly scientific, but I think it illustrates pretty well that one or two long runs — which he could break at any time against any team — have a huge impact on the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vhawk		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/adrian-petersons-amazing-except-when-the-vikings-win/#comment-5862</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vhawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=5641#comment-5862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think a reasonable inference would be that going overboard to gear up to stop a RB at all costs is a really bad idea and leads to you getting stomped by a really bad QB.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a reasonable inference would be that going overboard to gear up to stop a RB at all costs is a really bad idea and leads to you getting stomped by a really bad QB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
