You’ll forgive me if I prefer not to use fantasy scoring in best-of-all-time arguments. I’m also skeptical of the methodology, which is not era-adjusted; recent players do much better than older players, so this tells us very little.

Do you think dominant seasons are primarily a product of randomness, or more of a true jump in the player’s ability? If it’s the former, I agree with Brad. If it’s the latter, I agree with you.