≡ Menu

The following post attributes authorship to Bryan Frye, but everything under the line comes from the mind of Adam Steele. We thank him for his contributions to the site and to football discussion.


 

For the second week in a row, the worst quarterbacks had more extreme performances than did the best. By absolute value, the eight worst games this season have been more extreme than the single best game. I don’t have a good explanation for this other than sheer randomness.

#QB Week 2DYARQBRzDYARzQBRzAvg
1Derek Carr14379.31.381.391.39
2Aaron Rodgers14476.91.391.281.34
3Patrick Mahomes14873.11.441.111.27
4Kirk Cousins7778.00.681.331.01
5Sam Darnold6678.10.561.340.95
6Tom Brady12463.41.180.660.92
7Teddy Bridgewater11961.81.130.590.86
8Daniel Jones6868.40.590.890.74
9Kyler Murray7965.70.700.770.73
10Matthew Stafford9462.10.860.600.73
11Ryan Tannehill5469.50.440.940.69
12Lamar Jackson6559.20.550.470.51
13Jimmy Garoppolo5755.40.470.290.38
14Russell Wilson8448.80.76-0.010.37
15Baker Mayfield3854.80.270.260.27
16Jalen Hurts462.5-0.100.620.26
17Josh Allen-2263.3-0.370.660.14
18Jared Goff-856.4-0.220.340.06
19Carson Wentz-2857.3-0.440.38-0.03
20Taylor Heinicke5235.70.42-0.62-0.10
21Dak Prescott1942.40.06-0.31-0.12
22Ben Roethlisberger7129.60.62-0.90-0.14
23Justin Herbert534.2-0.08-0.68-0.38
24Mac Jones-5628.8-0.73-0.93-0.83
25Matt Ryan-9736.6-1.17-0.57-0.87
26Jacoby Brissett-13037.2-1.52-0.55-1.03
27Trevor Lawrence-11230.7-1.33-0.85-1.09
28Davis Mills-3810.1-0.54-1.79-1.17
29Jameis Winston-13821.6-1.61-1.26-1.44
30Joe Burrow-15815.9-1.82-1.53-1.67
31Justin Fields-1224.4-1.44-2.06-1.75
32Zach Wilson-1878.8-2.13-1.85-1.99

Derek Carr scored the highest in both metrics, which is surprising in that his feat came against an allegedly great Steelers defense. Early in the season, DYAR has no opponent adjustments and I’m not sure how QBR does theirs with such a small sample size. Regardless, Carr thrived on deep passes which has been a weakness throughout his career. If he suddenly developed a great deep ball, the Raiders offense will be scary this year.

Aaron Rodgers and Jameis Winston essentially swap places from last week. Rodgers is back to his usual self, and the operator of the Jameis rollercoaster must have fallen asleep at the switch.

Sam Darnold at #5 is odd for a couple reasons. One, he’s Sam Darnold and we’re not used to seeing him near the top in any QB ranking. Two, he scores much better in QBR despite having the type of game QBR usually hates – lots of short passes to wide open receivers.

Russell Wilson‘s placing at #14 is worth a closer look. He had a great game by conventional stats, a good game by DYAR, and a below average game by QBR. Wilson’s Y/A was padded by two 60+ yard completions but his success rate was relatively poor, and that tends to hurt in advanced metrics. But the sacks he took really hurt him in QBR, which generally levies a much stiffer penalty than DYAR. Specifically, the sack he took in overtime was basically the worst possible play a QB could make that isn’t a turnover, and it was done in a maximum leverage situation.

Jalen Hurts and Josh Allen both score much higher in QBR because their rushing contributions are given significant weight, while in DYAR the baseline for a successful QB rush is so high as to severely mute the opportunity for accumulating value.

And what about the extreme negative performances mentioned earlier? In week two there was a clear pattern: rookies. Four of the six worst games this week were authored by NFL newbies. This is forgivable and says almost nothing about their long term futures, but it does seem clear that all of them face a steep learning curve to achieve professional success.

At the macro level, the extreme TD/INT splits posted by the league in week one fell back to Earth in week two. This week saw 49 touchdown passes and 34 interceptions, harkening back to the bygone era of the early 2010’s. Still, the league is completing over 2/3 of its pass attempts in 2021, which would have been unthinkable throughout the vast majority of NFL history.

What stands out to you?

{ 0 comments }