<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 538: Are the Broncos or Seahawks More Immune From Regression?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/538-are-the-broncos-or-seahawks-more-immune-from-regression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/538-are-the-broncos-or-seahawks-more-immune-from-regression/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick M.		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/538-are-the-broncos-or-seahawks-more-immune-from-regression/#comment-199775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=21277#comment-199775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wondering what y&#039;all think about all this now that the new season is about a third done. Clearly Seattle&#039;s D has regressed but is still elite. The legion of boom seems pretty human. My opinion is this: Seattle&#039;s secondary (as amazing as it was) was overrated last year. The key to their D was their D line, specifically in terms of pass rush. The secondary&#039;s job is SOOO much easier when they only have to cover a guy for a couple seconds before the QB starts running for his life (or just falls to the ground, in the case of Manning). I don&#039;t remember a D getting as much consistent pressure on QBs with a 4 man rush as Seattle&#039;s did last year, with the super bowl being the prime example. I felt like their D line sort of slipped under the radar because of the hype (and loud mouths, combined with obvious talent) of their secondary. In other words, what&#039;s regressed for Seattle is their pass rush, and if i remember correctly, declination of pass rush quality is pretty typical. I know they&#039;ve had injuries and will almost certainly find a way into the playoffs, but the simple fact that they&#039;re not getting consistent QB pressure with 4 guys makes their D (and their whole team) beatable in a way that didn&#039;t seem possible last year. 

On a different note, Seattle HAS had trouble with penalties this year. but the problem seems to be an incredibly sloppy OL, which is a bit surprising to me. Not so much a problem with D holding and interference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering what y&#8217;all think about all this now that the new season is about a third done. Clearly Seattle&#8217;s D has regressed but is still elite. The legion of boom seems pretty human. My opinion is this: Seattle&#8217;s secondary (as amazing as it was) was overrated last year. The key to their D was their D line, specifically in terms of pass rush. The secondary&#8217;s job is SOOO much easier when they only have to cover a guy for a couple seconds before the QB starts running for his life (or just falls to the ground, in the case of Manning). I don&#8217;t remember a D getting as much consistent pressure on QBs with a 4 man rush as Seattle&#8217;s did last year, with the super bowl being the prime example. I felt like their D line sort of slipped under the radar because of the hype (and loud mouths, combined with obvious talent) of their secondary. In other words, what&#8217;s regressed for Seattle is their pass rush, and if i remember correctly, declination of pass rush quality is pretty typical. I know they&#8217;ve had injuries and will almost certainly find a way into the playoffs, but the simple fact that they&#8217;re not getting consistent QB pressure with 4 guys makes their D (and their whole team) beatable in a way that didn&#8217;t seem possible last year. </p>
<p>On a different note, Seattle HAS had trouble with penalties this year. but the problem seems to be an incredibly sloppy OL, which is a bit surprising to me. Not so much a problem with D holding and interference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick Bradley		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/538-are-the-broncos-or-seahawks-more-immune-from-regression/#comment-153741</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=21277#comment-153741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/538-are-the-broncos-or-seahawks-more-immune-from-regression/#comment-153097&quot;&gt;Ian&lt;/a&gt;.

Preseason doesn&#039;t mean anything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/538-are-the-broncos-or-seahawks-more-immune-from-regression/#comment-153097">Ian</a>.</p>
<p>Preseason doesn&#8217;t mean anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
