<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2017 Team Efficiency Ratings: The Saints Were The NFL&#8217;s Best Team	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/2017-team-efficiency-ratings-the-saints-were-the-nfls-best-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2017-team-efficiency-ratings-the-saints-were-the-nfls-best-team/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 21:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chase		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2017-team-efficiency-ratings-the-saints-were-the-nfls-best-team/#comment-331068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=36604#comment-331068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Saints/Vikings preview:

Saints passing game: New Orleans ranks 1st in pass efficiency, Minnesota ranks 3rd in pass defense
Saints rushing game: New Orleans ranks 1st in rush efficiency, Minnesota ranks 4th in rush defense

This is a great matchup of strength versus strength. Hard to find a more compelling matchup in most playoff seasons.

Minnesota passing game: Vikings rank 7th in pass efficiency, Saints rank 8th in pass defense
Minnesota running game: Vikings rank 19th in rush efficiency, Saints rank 23rd in rush defense

The Saints have a very slight edge when they have the ball, and the Vikings have a very slight edge when they have the ball.

Overall: These are the top two teams in football on a per play basis.  Both teams are really balanced, with NO having an incredible offense and a good defense, with the Vikings having the reverse.  Minnesota has home field advantage, but coaching and special teams may prove to be the difference maker today.

Prediction: Minnesota 23, New Orleans 21]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saints/Vikings preview:</p>
<p>Saints passing game: New Orleans ranks 1st in pass efficiency, Minnesota ranks 3rd in pass defense<br />
Saints rushing game: New Orleans ranks 1st in rush efficiency, Minnesota ranks 4th in rush defense</p>
<p>This is a great matchup of strength versus strength. Hard to find a more compelling matchup in most playoff seasons.</p>
<p>Minnesota passing game: Vikings rank 7th in pass efficiency, Saints rank 8th in pass defense<br />
Minnesota running game: Vikings rank 19th in rush efficiency, Saints rank 23rd in rush defense</p>
<p>The Saints have a very slight edge when they have the ball, and the Vikings have a very slight edge when they have the ball.</p>
<p>Overall: These are the top two teams in football on a per play basis.  Both teams are really balanced, with NO having an incredible offense and a good defense, with the Vikings having the reverse.  Minnesota has home field advantage, but coaching and special teams may prove to be the difference maker today.</p>
<p>Prediction: Minnesota 23, New Orleans 21</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Four Touchdowns		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2017-team-efficiency-ratings-the-saints-were-the-nfls-best-team/#comment-330937</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Four Touchdowns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=36604#comment-330937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How did you calculate efficiency for defenses? The same formula as offense efficiency, only for their opponents?

Really cool article. And despite the Pats ranking lower than other playoff teams, I somehow get the feeling they&#039;re going to be fine...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you calculate efficiency for defenses? The same formula as offense efficiency, only for their opponents?</p>
<p>Really cool article. And despite the Pats ranking lower than other playoff teams, I somehow get the feeling they&#8217;re going to be fine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
