<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2014 MVP Odds and Historical QB MVP Performance	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/2014-mvp-odds-and-historical-qb-mvp-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2014-mvp-odds-and-historical-qb-mvp-performance/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: RustyHilgerReborn		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2014-mvp-odds-and-historical-qb-mvp-performance/#comment-139926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RustyHilgerReborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=20775#comment-139926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/2014-mvp-odds-and-historical-qb-mvp-performance/#comment-139062&quot;&gt;Richie&lt;/a&gt;.

This might explain why Stafford has such high odds, since he was the second  least-sacked quarterback behind the elder Manning in 2013. Still, even as a Lions fan, I think 20-1 is a sucker bet, and can&#039;t imagine they&#039;ll be getting much action with those odds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/2014-mvp-odds-and-historical-qb-mvp-performance/#comment-139062">Richie</a>.</p>
<p>This might explain why Stafford has such high odds, since he was the second  least-sacked quarterback behind the elder Manning in 2013. Still, even as a Lions fan, I think 20-1 is a sucker bet, and can&#8217;t imagine they&#8217;ll be getting much action with those odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2014-mvp-odds-and-historical-qb-mvp-performance/#comment-139495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 02:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=20775#comment-139495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny how people who are so biased talk about Manning &quot;choking&quot; in playoff games.  He really has not, as his career passer rating in playoff games shows.  He is ranked in the top ten all time in playoff passer rating, ahead of several multiple Super Bowl winners, including Brady.  And since QBR was established in 2006, he has ranked very high in playoff QBR each year.  Last year he played bad against the Seahawks.  Some news: every QB played bad against the Seahawks.  They were one of the best defensive teams of my lifetime, and proved it game after game.  In the AFC playoff games before the Super Bowl, Manning outclassed both Rivers and Brady in getting the Broncos to the Super Bowl.  Have we forgot about that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how people who are so biased talk about Manning &#8220;choking&#8221; in playoff games.  He really has not, as his career passer rating in playoff games shows.  He is ranked in the top ten all time in playoff passer rating, ahead of several multiple Super Bowl winners, including Brady.  And since QBR was established in 2006, he has ranked very high in playoff QBR each year.  Last year he played bad against the Seahawks.  Some news: every QB played bad against the Seahawks.  They were one of the best defensive teams of my lifetime, and proved it game after game.  In the AFC playoff games before the Super Bowl, Manning outclassed both Rivers and Brady in getting the Broncos to the Super Bowl.  Have we forgot about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
