<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2013 Pro Bowlers announced	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footballperspective.com/2013-pro-bowlers-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2013-pro-bowlers-announced/</link>
	<description>NFL History and Stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2013-pro-bowlers-announced/#comment-69371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=16299#comment-69371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.footballperspective.com/2013-pro-bowlers-announced/#comment-69369&quot;&gt;James&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;d also be okay with voting in 13 or 14 players on each side of the ball. Why not elect FBs and slot receivers and second tight ends if that&#039;s how the offense plays? Sure they can&#039;t all be on the field as &quot;starters&quot; but if a fullback is on the field 30% of snaps, a third receiver 80%, and a second tight end 40% why not have all of them?

Elect an entire 4-3 front seven and a 3-4 front seven, AND nickel and dime cornerbacks and linebackers, and let Deion or whoever figure out where they will actually play in the game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.footballperspective.com/2013-pro-bowlers-announced/#comment-69369">James</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be okay with voting in 13 or 14 players on each side of the ball. Why not elect FBs and slot receivers and second tight ends if that&#8217;s how the offense plays? Sure they can&#8217;t all be on the field as &#8220;starters&#8221; but if a fullback is on the field 30% of snaps, a third receiver 80%, and a second tight end 40% why not have all of them?</p>
<p>Elect an entire 4-3 front seven and a 3-4 front seven, AND nickel and dime cornerbacks and linebackers, and let Deion or whoever figure out where they will actually play in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>http://www.footballperspective.com/2013-pro-bowlers-announced/#comment-69369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footballperspective.com/?p=16299#comment-69369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So how long until Pro Bowl rosters start electing slot receivers and corners, and 6 man &quot;front 7s&quot;?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how long until Pro Bowl rosters start electing slot receivers and corners, and 6 man &#8220;front 7s&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
